The purpose of this Framework Decision is to approximate the laws and regulations of the Member States in relation to police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, so as to combat the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography. It introduces a framework of common provisions on criminalisation, sanctions, aggravating circumstances, assistance to victims and jurisdiction.
This Framework Decision lists a number of behaviours which as offences related to the sexual exploitation of children are to be considered illegal:
The following is deemed to be punishable conduct that constitutes an offence related to child pornography *, whether undertaken by means of a computer system * or not:
Each Member State is obliged to take the necessary measures to ensure that instigation of one of the aforementioned offences and any attempt to commit the prohibited conduct is punishable.
Each Member State must make provision for criminal penalties which entail imprisonment for at least one to three years. For certain offences committed in aggravating circumstances, the penalty must entail imprisonment for at least five to ten years. The Framework Decision provides a list of aggravating circumstances, which does not preclude the recognition of other circumstances under national law:
Each Member State may take measures to ensure that a natural person, i.e. an individual, convicted of one of the aforementioned offences be prevented from exercising professional activities related to the supervision of children.
In addition the Framework Decision establishes the criminal and civil liability of legal persons *. This liability is complementary to that which is borne by natural persons. A legal person is deemed to be liable if an offence is committed for its benefit by another person who acts individually or as part of an organ of the legal person, or who has decision-making powers.
Sanctions on legal persons must include criminal or non-criminal fines and other sanctions such as temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial activities, a judicial winding-up order or exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid.
To prevent a crime from going unpunished because of a conflict of jurisdiction, the Decision establishes criteria for determining jurisdiction. A State has jurisdiction if:
A State that refuses to extradite its nationals must take the necessary measures to prosecute them for offences committed outside its territory.
Each Member State must establish programmes of assistance for the victims and their family in accordance with Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA.